The post Some tricky algebra – and how to make it easier appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>

First thing I think is – Wow, that looks complicated.

[Actually, the first thing I should think is, what sign is that. It is a divide sum in the middle, not an add sign as I first thought]

Algebra fractions can stump the brighter students, but its worth remembering to rules are just the same as fractions with numbers.

We could do this divide sum by flipping the second and multiplying the numerators together and then the denominators. But given that we are told the final answer is simple, there is certain to be a lot of simplifying we can we first.

The first thing I noitices was that the bottom of the second fraction was going to factorise. It looks so close to the ‘difference of 2 squares’ rules.

Indeed it does factorise to

x(x+5)(x-5)

And immediately we see there is some cancelling to be done with the top to give 1/x(x-5) for the second fraction

What about the bottom of the first fraction. Looks like there could be some factorising to be done there. And indeed, taking my cue from the (x-5) we have already seen, this factorises to

(x – 5)(x + 2)

Something I missed before because I was so busy factorising the higher powers of x, but the top can be factorised as 3(x+2) and so we can cancel to

3/(x-5)

NOW we can do the divide by flipping the 2nd fraction, and the operation is now much easier than before

3/(x – 5) * x(x – 5) [Using an * for multiply here to stop confusion with the x’s]

which is then 3x = so a = 3.

;

The post Some tricky algebra – and how to make it easier appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>The post Circles and Squares – The Answer appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>And now, as promised, the answer.

I’ve added a few coloured lines to help me talk this through.

The width of the square is the width of two of the circles. I have marked this with the two parallel grey lines of different shades. As we are told each of the circles has a radius of 24cm, that makes the width of the square 4 x this – 96cm!

The height of the rectangle is a bit less, because there is an overlap of the circle diameters in that direction.

We do know the height includes two radiuses* – shown as the parallel red/pink lines. But there is also the height of the green triangle, shown in blue on the height of the rectangle.

We can find that using Pythagoras Theorem – By splitting the green triangle in half, we have two right angled triangle with sides 48cm (the hypotenuse) and 24cm… so h^{2} + 24^{2} = 48^{2}.

h = sqrt(1728) = 41.57cm (to 4 s.f.)**

It can be easy after doing the most complex part of a calculation to forget we haven’t yet finished the question. Let’s not fall into that trap. We still need to find the total height of the rectangle, and thus the area of the rectangle.

Total height is 41.57 + 2 x 24 = 89.57cm

Area = 89.57 x 96 = 8600cm^{2} (To 3 s.f)

A couple of notes about my solution

* Yes, the official plural is radii – from the Latin! I always think that looks a bit old fashioned so I tend to say radiuses!

**Its often a judgement call how one rounds ones answer. Exam questions will sometimes say (Round to 3 s.f. or 1d.p) but if they don’t, show what rounding you have done. It is not appropriate to give more figures than any rounding given in the data provided…. BUT if you know you are going to round to 3 s.f. at the end, keep one extra figure in the intermediate numbers. That’s why I use 4.s.f for h, even though I know I am going to give a less precise answer at the end

The post Circles and Squares – The Answer appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>The post Circles and Squares appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>To find the area of the rectangle we need to find the length of the rectangle and its height.

The Length isn’t too hard, but can you see how to find the height before I post the answer here on Thursday?

The post Circles and Squares appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>The post Understanding sequences appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>But this is a simple rule with numbers my Dad showed me. Try adding up the odd numbers one by one, and see what you get

1 = 1

1 + 3 = 4

1 + 3 + 5 = 9

1 + 3 + 5 + 7 = 16

1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 = 25

You will recognise these numbers – all the squares! And this is the secret behind a type of questions I’ve seen on exam papers recently

There are a lot of different sequence questions, and its best not to leap in until you have really recognised. But if nothing appears to you, a next step is to look at how the numbers are increasing. Actually write the numbers in the gaps. If you worked them out in your head you might not see the pattern.

Here the gaps are : 7 11 15 19

And you will see straight away they are increasing steadily – By 4 each time. – And when you see this – that the second level of differences are constant – you will know you have a ‘quadratic’ sequence.

That is to say, the expression in terms of n will be of the form

an^{2} + bn + c – where b and c could be 0 but a is not (If a was 0, the first differences would be constant)

If you play with these sequences for long enough, you will find something very interesting but for this posts I’ll let you in on the secret

To find what a should be, take half of the ‘constant’ you find by following the differences. In this case that was 4, so a = 2.

So our sequence rule starts 2n^{2}

We are now going to write our sequence again, and underneath, write double the square numbers

4 11 22 37 56

2 8 18 32 50

Takes away the bottom from from the top, you get

2 3 4 5 6

or n + 1 for each position

This means our full answer is

2n^{2} + n + 1

The post Understanding sequences appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>The post What can we say about a difficult question appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>I’m not going to use them all for blog posts, but this was an interesting one I think.

First thought – How can we tell that? Your calculator isn’t going to help; Numbers that big are not going to give you the last digit.

So if we can’t tell directly, what can we tell? Actually, we need to start playing, and playing with numbers is something I love to do.

Let’s start by looking at what powers of 4 are like – That’s going to help us

You don’t have to go very far before seeing that every second number – every power of 4 to an odd number – end in a 4.

Continue that pattern on and we can see 4 to power 333 is going to end in 4.

What about powers of 3 – and here I did need my calculator – 3 9 27 81 243 729 2187 6561

Every fourth number in this list 4th, 8th – and indeed the one before the 3 would be 1, 3^ 0) ends in a 1.

All the numbers divisible by 4 in fact. So we can say for sure that 3 to the power 444 end in a 1.

And a number ending in a 4 plus a number ending in a 1 will end in a 5.

WE have shown what we were asked to show, and we didn’t have to work out the whole number

The post What can we say about a difficult question appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>The post Where the tutor went wrong appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>In my last post I described a question where I couldn’t see the answer.

When I took the question away and studied it, I realised I hadn’t read the question in full and it wasn’t my small doubts on Circle Theorems that were the issue.

However good you get at Maths there will always be some thinks you spot quicker than others – but in all cases, reading the quesion is so important!

The line I have underlined tells me that < CBA is x degrees – I was trying to think of another Circle Theorem that told me that! The alternate angle theorem tells us that <BAC is x degrees. Once we know the opposite angles are the same, so are the sides, so AC = BC

The post Where the tutor went wrong appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>The post When the tutor doesn’t listen to himself! appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>And here is a confession.. though I can do algebra and number skills in my head, if I ever have to stop and think, its on the Geometry and Angles questions.

So yesterday was with one of my brightest students, and we’d finished the main activity for the day so I brought out my reserve exam questions… and the first one was about the Alternative Angle Theorem.

I know this theorem well and I know I know it… but I don’t

always believe I know I know it! And yesterday I looked at the question and my student was looking at me expectantly… Later in the evening I realised the main problem was I hadn’t read the question! Doh, as Homer Simpson would say

Let’s have a look at the question – and how much easier it was once I’d read ALL the information!

I could immediately see that this was an Alternative Angle question – that is a picture of exactly when it applies. But ‘Prove AC = BC’ – I couldn’t see how to use the theorem to prove that. There didn’t seem to be enough information in the DIAGRAM!! Its where my moment of confidence crisis kicked in and I’m sharing this with you to show it happens to tutors too (especially when watched by eager students). The way out if this happens to you is to sit back, stay calm – possibly come back to this question later – and read ALL the information given

So who can spot what I didn’t read!! The answer to this – and the whole question – will be given tomorrow

The post When the tutor doesn’t listen to himself! appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>The post Tennis balls! appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>For this week’s posts I’m dipping into the weird land of Quora. As I may have mentioned before the Maths questions on this Q&A based social media site can be weird and can be trivial, like what is the LCM of 2 and 3.

That
is 6 by the way but I’m not going to dedicate a whole post to that.

Others today ask ‘Why do Negative numbers exist’ which is perhaps deeper than the questioner intended, and ‘What are the 100 ways of asking a woman for her number’, which is perhaps only loosely a Maths question. Though if this can be interpreted as her favourite number (not her phone number which I suspect was the idea) then it could be a more interesting one. What does someone’s favourite number say about them. Have I posted about my favourite number before? I should do that sometime.

But instead, let’s consider the one above….

This arrangement doesn’t have the correct number of balls, but it gives an idea

Draw a line between the two balls that are opposite. Count how many balls are above that line.

In this case the answer is 5. And the total number of balls is 12.

How did I get from one number to the other (apart from counting)?

There are 5 numbers above and 5 below. – That’s 2 times 5. Plus the two numbers on the line.

So that is 2 x 5 + 2 = 12.

I like to generalise these things and look for patterns, and that means , yes, algebra.

So what if the number of balls above the line is a.

The total number of balls is 2a + 2 (Times 2 then add 2)

Now lets think about the problem we are solving. There are
11 balls between the 8^{th} and 20^{th} (Count them, 9^{th}, 10^{th}, 11^{th}….
19^{th})

use our formula – 2 x 11 + 2 = 24.

There are 24 balls in our circle. We have solved the problem but, better than
that, we can answer quickly even if the question setter changed the numbers!

I like that approach; a bit more work and you can answer so many similar
questions

The post Tennis balls! appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>The post Christmassy problem – The answer! appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>So its the gift on days 6 and 7 that she gets most of; The geese a-laying and the swans a-swimming; 42 of each.. Lets hope she has a large pond

The post Christmassy problem – The answer! appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>The post A Christmassy Problem! appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>The twelve drummers drumming of course!

But is that really true because she only gets 12 drummers on the last day, on that one day. That’s a total number of 12 drummers.

She gets 11 pipers piping on the last two days, a total of 22 pipers! So that is the most, yeah, she gets most pipers?

Work back through the twelve days and see what she gets most of.

Answer in the next post, later this week.

The post A Christmassy Problem! appeared first on Tackle Maths.

]]>